• Home
  • Articles
  • Attorney Profiles
    • Richard G. Convicer
    • Robert J. Percy
  • Areas of Practice
    • Business Planning and Formation
    • Civil Tax Controversies & Litigation
    • Connecticut Tax Issues
    • Criminal Tax Fraud
    • Employee Benefits
    • Estate Planning
    • IRS Representation
  • Firm News
  • Contact Us

Call us today! (860) 657-9040

Find us on Map
Convicer & Percy, LLP Convicer & Percy, LLP Convicer & Percy, LLP Convicer & Percy, LLP
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Attorney Profiles
    • Richard G. Convicer
    • Robert J. Percy
  • Areas of Practice
    • Business Planning and Formation
    • Civil Tax Controversies & Litigation
    • Connecticut Tax Issues
    • Criminal Tax Fraud
    • Employee Benefits
    • Estate Planning
    • IRS Representation
  • Firm News
  • Contact Us

Prosecutorial Immunity Inapplicable to Disclosure

Home IRS Representation Prosecutorial Immunity Inapplicable to Disclosure

Prosecutorial Immunity Inapplicable to Disclosure

Posted by Convicer Percy | IRS Representation |

In Lampton v. Diaz, 639 F.3d 223 (5th Cir. 2011), the Fifth Circuit held that prosecutorial immunity from suit did not extend to a prosecutor’s post-trial transfer of a defendant’s private federal tax records to a state ethics commission.

Between 2003 and 2006, Dunnica Lampton (“Lampton”), the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Mississippi, prosecuted Oliver Diaz (“Diaz”), a Mississippi Supreme Court justice, and Diaz’s wife, Jennifer Diaz, for fraud, bribery, and tax evasion. Diaz was acquitted, but his wife pleaded guilty to tax evasion. Lampton then filed a complaint with the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance (the “Commission”) regarding Diaz’s conduct. He included copies of the Diazes’ federal tax records obtained during the criminal investigation. The Commission dismissed the complaint in December 2008.

The Diazes sued Lampton in federal court, alleging a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on deprivation of rights under a number of statutes that prohibit government officials from releasing private tax records obtained in the course of their duties, including 26 U.S.C. §§ 6103, 7213, and 7431. Lampton filed a motion to dismiss the § 1983 claim, arguing that absolute prosecutorial immunity shielded his decision to give the tax records to the Commission. The district court denied the motion, and Lampton appealed.

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of Lampton’s motion to dismiss, holding that prosecutorial immunity did not apply to Lampton’s conduct. The appellate court reasoned that, as a federal prosecutor, Lampton had no duty to bring complaints before a state ethics commission, and the actions for which Lampton sought immunity were unrelated to his prosecution of the Diazes. Further, Lampton could have reported Diaz’s misconduct without releasing the tax records, so his ethical responsibilities did not compel violation of the federal statute.

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email is safe with us.
Cancel Reply

Areas of Practice

  • IRS Representation
  • Connecticut Tax Issues
  • Estate Planning
  • Business Planning and Formation
  • Employee Benefits

Recent Firm News

  • Convicer & Percy ranked Tier 1 by U. S. News
  • Richard Convicer Honored by Tax Insitute
  • Attorneys Convicer & Percy present at Connecticut Bar Assoc.
  • Convicer & Percy Teach Tax Procedure for CT Bar
  • Richard Convicer speaks at the NE Tax Institute

Contact Us

We're currently offline. Send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message
Contact a Tax Lawyer in Connecticut or Massachusetts! Contact Us Today!
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 2014
Brookline, MA 02446
Phone: (860) 657-9040
Fax: (860) 657-9039

Areas of Practice

  • IRS Representation
  • Connecticut Tax Issues
  • Estate Planning
  • Business Planning and Formation
  • Employee Benefits

© 2022 · Convicer & Percy, LLP · All Rights Reserved

Prev Next